Question · asked by 1 review

IV cyclophosphamide vs IV dexamethasone and oral cyclophosphamide: Treatment response at 18 months ‐ Sustained remission/steroid sensitive relapses Clinical assessment

IV cyclophosphamide showed no clear difference in treatment response at 18 months: sustained… compared with oral cyclophosphamide plus IV dexamethasone (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
IV cyclophosphamide vs oral cyclophosphamide plus IV dexamethasone
Treatment response at 18 months: sustained remission/steroid‐sensitive relapses · idiopathic steroid‐resistant nephrotic syndrome in children
IV cyclophosphamide showed no clear difference in treatment response at 18 months: sustained… compared with oral cyclophosphamide plus IV dexamethasone (low certainty).
Interventions for idiopathic steroid‐resistant nephrotic syndrome in children (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.13 [0.65, 1.96]1 study · 49 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for idiopathic steroid‐resistant nephrotic syndrome in children
2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.