Question · asked by 1 review
Ball (stud) attachment system vs Telescopic attachment system: Patient satisfaction / quality of life (validated measure)
- Population
- Edentulous adults receiving mandibular implant overdentures (opposing conventional complete maxillary dentures)
- Intervention
- Ball (stud) attachment system
- Comparison
- Telescopic attachment system
- Outcome
- Patient satisfaction / quality of life (validated measure)
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Ball (stud) attachment system vs Telescopic attachment system Patient satisfaction / quality of life (validated measure) · Edentulous adults receiving mandibular implant overdentures (opposing conventional complete maxillary dentures) Interventions for replacing missing teeth: attachment systems for implant overdentures in edentulous jaws (2018) · Cochrane All outcomes | Cepa 2017 assessed patient satisfaction but did not use validated measures and we could not use the data. Quality of life as assessed by a validated measure was not recorded. | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: attachment systems for implant overdentures in edentulous jaws 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2018-01 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Ball (stud) attachment system vs Magnetic attachment system · Edentulous adults receiving mandibular implant overdentures (opposing conventional… · 1 review
- Ball (stud) attachment system vs Bar attachment system · Edentulous adults receiving mandibular implant overdentures (opposing conventional… · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.