Question · asked by 1 review

Aversive tasting substance applied to digit vs Psychological intervention (habit reversal): Sucking cessation (short term)

Population
Children with a non-nutritive sucking habit (digit or pacifier)
Intervention
Aversive tasting substance applied to digit
Comparison
Psychological intervention (habit reversal)
Outcome
Sucking cessation (short term)

Aversive tasting substance applied to digit showed no clear difference in sucking cessation (short term) compared with psychological intervention (habit reversal); GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Aversive tasting substance applied to digit vs Psychological intervention (habit reversal)
Sucking cessation (short term) · Children with a non-nutritive sucking habit (digit or pacifier) · Short term (less than 12 months)
Aversive tasting substance applied to digit showed no clear difference in sucking cessation (short term) compared with psychological intervention (habit reversal); GRADE not reported.
Interventions for the cessation of non‐nutritive sucking habits in children (2015) · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 0.18 [0.03, 1.24]1 study · 29 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for the cessation of non‐nutritive sucking habits in children
2015 · Cochrane All outcomes
2014-10Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.