Question · asked by 1 review

Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) vs Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur): Duration of treatment

Population
Children, adolescents and adults with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth (age 3.5 to 84 years)
Intervention
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG)
Comparison
Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur)
Outcome
Duration of treatment

Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) led to higher duration of treatment compared with conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece…; GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) vs Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur)
Duration of treatment · Children, adolescents and adults with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth (age 3.5 to 84 years)
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) led to higher duration of treatment compared with conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece…; GRADE not reported.
Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth (2016) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD 0.90 [0.59, 1.21]4 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth
2016 · Cochrane All outcomes
2016-06Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.