Question · asked by 1 review
Buccal onlay iliac grafts fixed with titanium screws vs Buccal onlay iliac grafts fixed with resorbable screws (split-mouth): Implant/prosthesis failure and complications
- Population
- Patients with resorbed maxillae (incl. atrophic sinuses) needing implants
- Intervention
- Buccal onlay iliac grafts fixed with titanium screws
- Comparison
- Buccal onlay iliac grafts fixed with resorbable screws (split-mouth)
- Outcome
- Implant/prosthesis failure and complications
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Buccal onlay iliac grafts fixed with titanium screws vs Buccal onlay iliac grafts fixed with resorbable screws (split-mouth) Implant/prosthesis failure and complications · Patients with resorbed maxillae (incl. atrophic sinuses) needing implants · 2 years post-loading Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental… (2009) · Cochrane All outcomes | No statistically significant difference for any outcome; data not shown (Raghoebar 2006) | 1 study · 8 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment 2009 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2009-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.