Question · asked by 1 review

Progestogen therapy long cycle (3 to 4 weeks) vs other medical therapy: Adverse effect Breakthrough bleeding/spotting

Progestogen therapy long cycle (3 to 4 weeks) may leads to lower adverse effect Breakthrough bleeding/spotting compared with other medical therapy (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Progestogen therapy long cycle (3 to 4 weeks) vs other medical therapy
Adverse effect Breakthrough bleeding/spotting · women with heavy menstrual bleeding
Progestogen therapy long cycle (3 to 4 weeks) may leads to lower adverse effect Breakthrough bleeding/spotting compared with other medical therapy (low certainty).
Cyclical progestogens for heavy menstrual bleeding (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.18 [0.06, 0.55]3 studies · 220 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Cyclical progestogens for heavy menstrual bleeding
2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.