Question · asked by 1 review

Ventilation tubes vs myringotomy: Adverse event: persistent perforation

Population
children aged 6 months to 12 years with otitis media with effusion (OME)
Intervention
Ventilation tubes
Comparison
myringotomy
Outcome
Adverse event: persistent perforation

Ventilation tubes showed no clear difference in adverse event: persistent perforation Range of compared with myringotomy (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Ventilation tubes vs myringotomy
Adverse event: persistent perforation Range of · children aged 6 months to 12 years with OME
Ventilation tubes showed no clear difference in adverse event: persistent perforation Range of compared with myringotomy (moderate certainty).
Ventilation tubes (grommets) for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extractedNot reportedModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Ventilation tubes (grommets) for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children
2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.