Question · asked by 1 review
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation vs no treatment or waiting list: Adverse events
- Population
- adults (>= 18 years) with an irreversible visual impairment
- Intervention
- Multidisciplinary rehabilitation
- Comparison
- no treatment or waiting list
- Outcome
- Adverse events
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation vs waiting list or no care Adverse events · adults (>= 18 years) with an irreversible visual impairment Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 193 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Multidisciplinary rehabilitation vs active control · adults (>= 18 years) with an irreversible visual impairment · 1 review
- Multidisciplinary rehabilitation vs other treatment · Subacute low back pain · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.