Question · asked by 1 review

Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) vs Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur): Participant discomfort (vibration, smell, noise)

Population
Children, adolescents and adults with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth (age 3.5 to 84 years)
Intervention
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG)
Comparison
Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur)
Outcome
Participant discomfort (vibration, smell, noise)

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Laser (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG) vs Conventional mechanical caries removal (standard drill; handpiece with a bur)
Participant discomfort (vibration, smell, noise) · Children, adolescents and adults with caries in deciduous and permanent teeth (age 3.5 to 84 years) · during treatment
Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth (2016) · Cochrane All outcomes
Five studies reported participant discomfort (Belcheva 2014; Evans 2000; Hadley 2000; Keller 1998; Liu 2006). Keller 1998 (90 adults): discomfort significantly lower with laser (Analysis 1.6). Hadley 2000 (66 adults):…5 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth
2016 · Cochrane All outcomes
2016-06Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.