Question · asked by 1 review

Opal Seal fluoride-releasing primer vs Conventional Transbond XT primer: White spot lesions assessed by laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent)

Population
Orthodontic patients of any age with fixed braces (new DLs assessed at debond)
Intervention
Opal Seal fluoride-releasing primer
Comparison
Conventional Transbond XT primer
Outcome
White spot lesions assessed by laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent)

Opal Seal had fewer DIAGNOdent-measured lesions, with certainty not graded.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Opal Seal fluoride-releasing primer vs Conventional Transbond XT primer
DIAGNOdent white spot lesion measurement · Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment · During orthodontic treatment, Fixed orthodontic treatment
Opal Seal had fewer DIAGNOdent-measured lesions, with certainty not graded.
Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed… (2024) All outcomes
Opal Seal group showed fewer WSLs compared to the Transbond group, with initial demineralization rates of 1.3% and 3.9%, and caries lesion rates of 0.2% and 1.3%, respectively (p <0.03).1 study · 56 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.