Question · asked by 1 review

Gastroesophageal or laryngopharyngeal reflux (GERD/LPR) vs Healthy controls: Oral/pharyngeal microbiota modifications

Population
Adults with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR)
Intervention
Gastroesophageal or laryngopharyngeal reflux (GERD/LPR)
Comparison
Healthy controls
Outcome
Oral/pharyngeal microbiota modifications

No eligible studies investigated reflux-related modifications of the oral or pharyngeal microbiota; this is an evidence gap identified by the review.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Gastroesophageal or laryngopharyngeal reflux (GERD/LPR) vs Healthy individuals (controls)
Oral/pharyngeal microbiota modifications · Adults with GERD/LPR reflux · Adult patients in gastroenterology, ENT and dental clinical settings
No eligible studies investigated reflux-related modifications of the oral or pharyngeal microbiota; this is an evidence gap identified by the review.
Laryngopharyngeal reflux, gastroesophageal reflux and dental disorders: A systematic review. (2020) All outcomes
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Laryngopharyngeal reflux, gastroesophageal reflux and dental disorders: A systematic review.
2020 All outcomes
January 1990 to December 2019 (publication period searched)24Not applicable
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.