Question · asked by 1 review

Double primary (canine and first molar) tooth extraction vs Single primary (canine) tooth extraction: Incidence of successfully erupted PDC that were favourably positioned

Population
Young people aged 9 to 14 years diagnosed with one or both palatally displaced permanent maxillary canines (PDC)
Intervention
Double primary (canine and first molar) tooth extraction
Comparison
Single primary (canine) tooth extraction
Outcome
Incidence of successfully erupted PDC that were favourably positioned

Double primary (canine and first molar) tooth extraction showed no clear difference in incidence of successfully erupted PDC that were favourably positioned compared with single primary (canine) tooth extraction; GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 3 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Double primary (canine and first molar) tooth extraction vs Single primary (canine) tooth extraction
Incidence of successfully erupted PDC that were favourably positioned · Young people aged 9 to 14 years diagnosed with one or both palatally displaced permanent maxillary canines (PDC) · 24 months
Double primary (canine and first molar) tooth extraction showed no clear difference in incidence of successfully erupted PDC that were favourably positioned compared with single primary (canine) tooth extraction; GRADE not reported.
Interventions for promoting the eruption of palatally displaced permanent canine teeth, without the need for… (2021) · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 1.64 [0.33, 8.03]1 study · 23 participantsGRADE not reported
Double primary (canine and first molar) tooth extraction vs Single primary (canine) tooth extraction
Incidence of successfully erupted PDC that were favourably positioned · Young people aged 9 to 14 years diagnosed with one or both palatally displaced permanent maxillary canines (PDC) · 12 months
Double primary (canine and first molar) tooth extraction showed no clear difference in incidence of successfully erupted PDC that were favourably positioned compared with single primary (canine) tooth extraction; GRADE not reported.
Interventions for promoting the eruption of palatally displaced permanent canine teeth, without the need for… (2021) · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 1.09 [0.08, 15.42]1 study · 23 participantsGRADE not reported
Double primary (canine and first molar) tooth extraction vs Single primary (canine) tooth extraction
Incidence of successfully erupted PDC that were favourably positioned · Young people aged 9 to 14 years diagnosed with one or both palatally displaced permanent maxillary canines (PDC) · 18 months
Double primary (canine and first molar) tooth extraction showed no clear difference in incidence of successfully erupted PDC that were favourably positioned compared with single primary (canine) tooth extraction; GRADE not reported.
Interventions for promoting the eruption of palatally displaced permanent canine teeth, without the need for… (2021) · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 1.64 [0.33, 8.03]1 study · 23 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for promoting the eruption of palatally displaced permanent canine teeth, without the need for surgical exposure, in…
2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
2021-02Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.