Question · asked by 1 review
Sleeping in darkness vs no treatment: Improvement in vertigo frequency
- Population
- Ménière’s disease
- Intervention
- Sleeping in darkness
- Comparison
- no treatment
- Outcome
- Improvement in vertigo frequency
It is very uncertain whether sleeping in darkness changes improvement in frequency of vertigo compared with no treatment (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Sleeping in darkness vs no treatment Improvement in frequency of vertigo · Ménière’s disease It is very uncertain whether sleeping in darkness changes improvement in frequency of vertigo compared with no treatment (very low certainty). Lifestyle and dietary interventions for Ménière’s disease (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.47 [1.15, 1.89] | 1 study · 130 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lifestyle and dietary interventions for Ménière’s disease 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.