Question · asked by 1 review

Exposure vs no exposure to the smell and taste of milk with tube feeds: Necrotising Enterocolitis ≥ Bell's stage 2 during initial hospital stay

Exposure showed no clear difference in necrotising enterocolitis during hospitalisation (Bell's stage ≥ 2) compared with no exposure to the smell and taste of milk with tube feeds (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Exposure vs no exposure to the smell and taste of milk with tube feeds
Necrotising enterocolitis during hospitalisation (Bell's stage ≥ 2) · preterm infants
Exposure showed no clear difference in necrotising enterocolitis during hospitalisation (Bell's stage ≥ 2) compared with no exposure to the smell and taste of milk with tube feeds (low certainty).
Exposure to the smell and taste of milk to accelerate feeding in preterm infants (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.93 [0.47, 1.84]2 studies · 435 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Exposure to the smell and taste of milk to accelerate feeding in preterm infants
2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.