Question · asked by 1 review

2.26% ammonium bifluoride (one-time) vs Control (details reported as unavailable): New coronal caries in permanent first molars (caries prevention)

One-time ammonium bifluoride gave a 56% prevented fraction, similar to SDF (57%) (single study; ungraded).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
2.26% ammonium bifluoride (one-time) vs Control (details reported as unavailable)
New coronal caries in permanent first molars (caries prevention) · Children with dental caries in permanent (first) molars · 12 months, School-based (children), Mauro 2004
One-time ammonium bifluoride gave a 56% prevented fraction, similar to SDF (57%) (single study; ungraded).
A systematic review on the effect of silver diamine fluoride for management of dental caries in permanent… (2023) All outcomes
Prevented Fraction 561 study · 141 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
A systematic review on the effect of silver diamine fluoride for management of dental caries in permanent teeth.
2023 All outcomes
December 202213Low / Critically Low

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.