Circuit class therapy vs other interventions: Falls
It is very uncertain whether circuit class therapy changes adverse events (falls) from all available trials Counts of numbers… compared with other intervention (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Circuit class therapy vs other intervention Adverse events (falls) from all available trials Counts of numbers of falls · people with stroke It is very uncertain whether circuit class therapy changes adverse events (falls) from all available trials Counts of numbers… compared with other intervention (very low certainty). Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RD 0.03 | 8 studies · 815 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.