Missing teeth / tooth loss vs No tooth loss or edentulism: Oral health-related quality of life
- Population
- Adolescents (10-19 years)
- Intervention
- Missing teeth / tooth loss
- Comparison
- No tooth loss or edentulism
- Outcome
- Oral health-related quality of life
The umbrella review reported that tooth loss and edentulism negatively affect oral health-related quality of life.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Tooth loss or edentulism vs No tooth loss or edentulism Oral health-related quality of life · Adolescents aged 10-19 years The umbrella review reported that tooth loss and edentulism negatively affect oral health-related quality of life. Oral-health-related quality of life in adolescents: umbrella review. (2023) All outcomes | no estimate extracted | Not reported | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral-health-related quality of life in adolescents: umbrella review. 2023 All outcomes | January 2022 | 22 | Not applicable |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Missing teeth / tooth loss vs No tooth loss · Adolescents (10-19 years) · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.