Question · asked by 1 review
GTR rm associated with bone substitutes + CAF vs SCTG + CAF: Aesthetic condition change related to patient's opinion
- Population
- Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm)
- Intervention
- GTR rm associated with bone substitutes + CAF
- Comparison
- SCTG + CAF
- Outcome
- Aesthetic condition change related to patient's opinion
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
GTR rm associated with bone substitutes + CAF vs SCTG + CAF Aesthetic condition change related to patient's opinion · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months) Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane All outcomes | Rosetti 2013: patient satisfaction survey indicated all patients satisfied with aesthetic results of both procedures at 18 months; no significant differences between 18- and 30-month assessments | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes | 15 January 2018 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- GTR rm associated with bone substitutes + CAF vs GTR rm + CAF · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at… · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.