Class I antiarrhythmics vs control: Recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias
Class I antiarrhythmics showed no clear difference in recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias compared with control (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Class I antiarrhythmics vs control Recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias · Human trial participants undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation Class I antiarrhythmics showed no clear difference in recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias compared with control (low certainty). Oral Class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs for maintaining sinus rhythm after catheter ablation of atrial… (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.54 [0.25, 1.19] | 1 study · 125 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral Class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs for maintaining sinus rhythm after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.