Question · asked by 1 review
Progesterone vs no treatment or placebo (route of progesterone administration): Adverse events, OHSS, preterm delivery, congenital anomaly
- Population
- women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination
- Intervention
- Progesterone
- Comparison
- no treatment or placebo (route of progesterone administration)
- Outcome
- Adverse events, OHSS, preterm delivery, congenital anomaly
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Progesterone vs no treatment or placebo (route of progesterone administration) Adverse events, OHSS, preterm delivery, congenital anomaly · women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination The review found no eligible studies for this question. Luteal phase support for women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination or sexual intercourse (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Luteal phase support for women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination or sexual intercourse 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Progesterone vs placebo/no treatment · women with gonadotropin stimulation · 1 review
- Progesterone vs placebo/no treatment · women with oral (clomiphene citrate or letrozole) stimulation · 1 review
- Progesterone vs placebo/no treatment · women with gonadotropin plus oral (clomiphene citrate or letrozole) stimulation · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.