Any Psychosocial intervention plus pharm vs pharm standard: Abstinence
Any Psychosocial intervention plus pharm showed no clear difference in number of participants abstinent at the end of compared with pharm standard (high certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Any Psychosocial intervention plus pharm vs pharm standard Number of participants abstinent at the end of · patients with treatment of opioid dependence Any Psychosocial intervention plus pharm showed no clear difference in number of participants abstinent at the end of compared with pharm standard (high certainty). Psychosocial combined with agonist maintenance treatments versus agonist maintenance treatments alone for… (2011) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.15 [0.98, 1.36] | 3 studies · 181 participants | High |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychosocial combined with agonist maintenance treatments versus agonist maintenance treatments alone for treatment of opioid dependence 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.