Question · asked by 1 review

Information video and counselling to improve access to cataract surgical services vs usual care: Service utilisation: uptake of referral

Information video and counselling to improve access to cataract… may leads to higher service utilisation: uptake of referral compared with standard care (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Information video and counselling to improve access to cataract surgical services vs standard care
Service utilisation: uptake of referral · people with vision impairment caused by cataract
Information video and counselling to improve access to cataract… may leads to higher service utilisation: uptake of referral compared with standard care (low certainty).
Interventions to improve access to cataract surgical services and their impact on equity in low‐ and… (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.031 study · 434 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions to improve access to cataract surgical services and their impact on equity in low‐ and middle‐income countries
2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.