Question · asked by 1 review
Setting of BP measurement: self‐measurement vs conventional clinic measurement: Pre‐eclampsia
- Population
- pregnant women with chronic or gestational hypertension
- Intervention
- Setting of BP measurement: self‐measurement
- Comparison
- conventional clinic measurement
- Outcome
- Pre‐eclampsia
Setting of BP measurement: self‐measurement showed no clear difference in pre‐eclampsia compared with conventional clinic measurement (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Setting of BP measurement: self‐measurement vs conventional clinic measurement Pre‐eclampsia · pregnant women with chronic or gestational hypertension Setting of BP measurement: self‐measurement showed no clear difference in pre‐eclampsia compared with conventional clinic measurement (low certainty). Setting and techniques for monitoring blood pressure during pregnancy (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.49 [0.87, 2.54] | 1 study · 154 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Setting and techniques for monitoring blood pressure during pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.