Self‐monitoring vs intermittent glucose monitoring: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: pre‐eclampsia
- Population
- women with gestational diabetes mellitus
- Intervention
- Self‐monitoring
- Comparison
- intermittent glucose monitoring
- Outcome
- Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: pre‐eclampsia
It is very uncertain whether self‐monitoring changes hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: pre‐eclampsia compared with periodic glucose monitoring (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Self‐monitoring vs periodic glucose monitoring Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: pre‐eclampsia · women with gestational diabetes mellitus It is very uncertain whether self‐monitoring changes hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: pre‐eclampsia compared with periodic glucose monitoring (very low certainty). Different methods and settings for glucose monitoring for gestational diabetes during pregnancy (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.17 [0.01, 3.49] | 1 study · 58 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Different methods and settings for glucose monitoring for gestational diabetes during pregnancy 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Self‐monitoring vs usual care · women with pre‐existing diabetes · 0 reviews
- Self‐monitoring vs hospitalisation · women with pre‐existing diabetes · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.