Tobacco cessation interventions vs placebo or usual care: Tobacco abstinence after counselling (counselling)
Tobacco cessation interventions showed no clear difference in tobacco abstinence after counselling (counselling) compared with placebo or usual care (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Tobacco cessation interventions vs placebo or usual care Tobacco abstinence after counselling (counselling) · people in treatment for or recovery from alcohol or other drug dependency Tobacco cessation interventions showed no clear difference in tobacco abstinence after counselling (counselling) compared with placebo or usual care (low certainty). Interventions for tobacco use cessation in people in treatment for or recovery from substance use disorders (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.33 [0.9, 1.95] | 11 studies · 1759 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for tobacco use cessation in people in treatment for or recovery from substance use disorders 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.