Question · asked by 1 review

Enamel matrix derivative (EMD; Emdogain) vs placebo or control: Change in probing attachment level (PAL)

Population
Patients affected by chronic, aggressive, or early onset periodontitis, with intrabony defects having an intrabony component of at least 3 mm
Intervention
Enamel matrix derivative (EMD; Emdogain)
Comparison
placebo or control
Outcome
Change in probing attachment level (PAL)

Enamel matrix derivative (EMD; Emdogain) may leads to higher change in probing attachment level (PAL) compared with placebo or control (same surgical or non-surgical intervention… (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Enamel matrix derivative (EMD; Emdogain) vs Placebo or control (same surgical or non-surgical intervention without EMD)
Change in probing attachment level (PAL) · Patients affected by chronic, aggressive, or early onset periodontitis, with intrabony defects having an intrabony… · 1 year (time-points 1, 5 and 10 years planned)
Enamel matrix derivative (EMD; Emdogain) may leads to higher change in probing attachment level (PAL) compared with placebo or control (same surgical or non-surgical intervention… (low certainty).
Enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain®) for periodontal tissue regeneration in intrabony defects (2009) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD 1.08 [0.61, 1.55]9 studies · 371 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain®) for periodontal tissue regeneration in intrabony defects
2009 · Cochrane All outcomes
2009-02Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.