Question · asked by 1 review

Training to respond to intimate partner violence vs no intervention, wait‐list or placebo on healthcare providers' attitudes towards, knowledge of and readiness to manage IPV, referrals: Referrals made to support agencies, social workers or other specialised services

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Training to respond to intimate partner violence vs no intervention, wait‐list or placebo on healthcare providers' attitudes towards, knowledge of and readiness to manage IPV, referrals
Referrals made to support agencies, social workers or other specialised services · physicians/doctors, medical staff, medical students, residents, nurses and nursing students, dentists and dental…
Training healthcare providers to respond to intimate partner violence against women (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted1 study · 49 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Training healthcare providers to respond to intimate partner violence against women
2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.