Question · asked by 1 review

Ion-releasing restorations (IRR): RMGIC, HVGIC, GIC, compomer/PMRC, giomer vs Composite resin (CR), including bulk-fill composite: Absence of wear

Wear was assessed in a single trial and was not pooled or GRADE-rated (ungraded).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Ion-releasing restorations (IRR): RMGIC, HVGIC, GIC, compomer/PMRC, giomer vs Composite resin (CR), including bulk-fill composite
Absence of wear · Children receiving dental restorations (aged 4-11 years; primary teeth; Class I/II/V cavities) · 2 years, Pediatric dentistry; primary molars/teeth (Class I, II, V cavities); trials from Turkey, Greece, Sweden, Brazil, and China
Wear was assessed in a single trial and was not pooled or GRADE-rated (ungraded).
Clinical effectiveness of ion-releasing restorations compared to composite restorations in pediatric dental… (2025) All outcomes
no estimate extracted1 studyGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Clinical effectiveness of ion-releasing restorations compared to composite restorations in pediatric dental treatments: a systematic…
2025 All outcomes
Up to January 202416Moderate / Moderate

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.