Question · asked by 1 review

Prevention of eclampsia: short vs standard maintenance regimen (subgroups by type of short regimen): Side effect: respiratory depression

Prevention of eclampsia: short showed no clear difference in side effect: respiratory depression compared with standard maintenance regimen (subgroups by type of short regimen) (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Prevention of eclampsia: short vs standard maintenance regimen (subgroups by type of short regimen)
Side effect: respiratory depression · women with pre‐eclampsia
Prevention of eclampsia: short showed no clear difference in side effect: respiratory depression compared with standard maintenance regimen (subgroups by type of short regimen) (low certainty).
Alternative magnesium sulphate regimens for women with pre‐eclampsia and eclampsia (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.8 [0.25, 2.61]2 studies · 1424 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Alternative magnesium sulphate regimens for women with pre‐eclampsia and eclampsia
2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.