PPI triple therapy for 10 days vs 7 days: H. pylori persistence, PAN subgroup
PPI triple therapy for 10 days showed no clear difference in H. pylori persistence, PAN subgroup compared with 7 days (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
PPI triple therapy for 10 days vs 7 days H. pylori persistence, PAN subgroup · patients with Helicobacter pylori infection PPI triple therapy for 10 days showed no clear difference in H. pylori persistence, PAN subgroup compared with 7 days (low certainty). Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.85 [0.65, 1.12] | 4 studies · 573 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.