Question · asked by 1 review
Individualised oral care plan based on a multidisciplinary assessment vs usual care: Plaque
- Population
- Adults aged 22 to 57 years with mixed levels of ID; setting residential
- Intervention
- Individualised oral care plan based on a multidisciplinary assessment
- Comparison
- usual care
- Outcome
- Plaque
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Individualised oral care plan based on a multidisciplinary assessment vs Usual care (regular oral hygiene care following the institution's standard guidelines) Plaque (medium term) · Adults aged 22 to 57 years with mixed levels of ID; setting residential · Medium term (6 weeks to 12 months) Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes | Individualised oral care plan vs usual care. Subjective Oral Hygiene Rating scale 1-5 and Improvement Differential, mean 12 months; SOHR 2.97 (intervention) vs 3.10 (control); improvement differential 38% vs 5%; 79… | 1 study · 79 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities 2019 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2019-02 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.