Question · asked by 1 review
Laser (low-level laser) at P6 point vs sham control: Adverse effects
- Population
- People (older than four years) classified as having gagging that interfered with dental treatment; included trials enrolled children
- Intervention
- Laser (low-level laser) at P6 point
- Comparison
- sham control
- Outcome
- Adverse effects
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Laser (low-level laser) at P6 point vs Control (sham/dummy laser) Adverse effects · People (older than four years) classified as having gagging that interfered with dental treatment; included trials… The review found no eligible studies for this question. Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes | Adverse effects: none of the trials reported adverse effects. | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment 2019 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2019-03 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.