Question · asked by 1 review
Wooden cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone: Interproximal caries
- Population
- Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)
- Intervention
- Wooden cleaning stick plus toothbrushing
- Comparison
- Toothbrushing alone
- Outcome
- Interproximal caries
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Wooden cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone Interproximal caries · Adults, 16 years and older (dentate) The review found no eligible studies for this question. Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling… (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes | No included study assessed caries as an outcome. | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling periodontal diseases and dental… 2019 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2019-01-16 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Wooden cleaning stick plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing · Adults, 16 years and older (dentate) · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.