Question · asked by 1 review
Planned caesarean section vs planned vaginal birth: Serious maternal morbidity or death
- Population
- women with a twin pregnancy
- Intervention
- Planned caesarean section
- Comparison
- planned vaginal birth
- Outcome
- Serious maternal morbidity or death
Planned caesarean section showed no clear difference in maternal death or serious maternal morbidity compared with planned vaginal birth (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Planned caesarean section vs planned vaginal birth Maternal death or serious maternal morbidity · women with a twin pregnancy Planned caesarean section showed no clear difference in maternal death or serious maternal morbidity compared with planned vaginal birth (moderate certainty). Planned caesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.86 [0.67, 1.11] | 2 studies · 2844 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Planned caesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.