Question · asked by 1 review
QUETIAPINE vs OLANZAPINE: Clinical response: mean score/change in mental state: mean PANSS total score (high = poor)
- Population
- schizophrenia
- Intervention
- QUETIAPINE
- Comparison
- OLANZAPINE
- Outcome
- Clinical response: mean score/change in mental state: mean PANSS total score (high = poor)
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
QUETIAPINE vs OLANZAPINE Mental state: 1. General ‐ average endpoint score (PANSS total, high = poor) · participants with schizophrenia Quetiapine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 11 studies · 1486 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quetiapine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.