Question · asked by 1 review

Laser (low-level laser) at P6 point vs sham control: Presence or absence of gagging

Population
People (older than four years) classified as having gagging that interfered with dental treatment; included trials enrolled children
Intervention
Laser (low-level laser) at P6 point
Comparison
sham control
Outcome
Presence or absence of gagging

It is very uncertain whether laser (low-level laser) at P6 point changes presence or absence of gagging compared with control (sham/dummy laser) (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Laser (low-level laser) at P6 point vs Control (sham/dummy laser)
Presence or absence of gagging · People (older than four years) classified as having gagging that interfered with dental treatment; included trials…
It is very uncertain whether laser (low-level laser) at P6 point changes presence or absence of gagging compared with control (sham/dummy laser) (very low certainty).
Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes
OR 86.33 [29.41, 253.45]1 study · 40 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment
2019 · Cochrane All outcomes
2019-03Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.