Question · asked by 1 review
AFI vs SDVP: summary of findings table: Rate of induction of labor
- Population
- pregnant women to prevent adverse pregnancy outcome
- Intervention
- AFI
- Comparison
- SDVP: summary of findings table
- Outcome
- Rate of induction of labor
AFI leads to higher rate of induction of labor compared with SDVP: summary of findings table (high certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
AFI vs SDVP: summary of findings table Rate of induction of labor · pregnant women to prevent adverse pregnancy outcome AFI leads to higher rate of induction of labor compared with SDVP: summary of findings table (high certainty). Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse… (2008) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.92 [1.5, 2.46] | 4 studies · 2138 participants | High |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome 2008 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.