Question · asked by 1 review
Fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride mouthrinse: Caries increment in permanent teeth
- Population
- Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less
- Intervention
- Fluoride toothpaste
- Comparison
- Fluoride mouthrinse
- Outcome
- Caries increment in permanent teeth
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride mouthrinse Caries increment (D(M)FS), permanent teeth · Children or adolescents aged 16 or less at the start of the study · 1 to 3 years (final follow-up) One topical fluoride (toothpastes, or mouthrinses, or gels, or varnishes) versus another for preventing… (2004) · Cochrane All outcomes | PF 0.00 [-0.18, 0.19] | 6 studies · 2545 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| One topical fluoride (toothpastes, or mouthrinses, or gels, or varnishes) versus another for preventing dental caries in children and… 2004 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2001-10 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride gel · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less · 1 review
- Fluoride toothpaste vs Any other topical fluoride (gel or mouthrinse) · Children and adolescents aged 16 years or less · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.