Question · asked by 1 review

Occlusal splint vs Palatal splint: Preference (device preferred by participants)

Population
People with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnosis clinical, polysomnographic, or both
Intervention
Occlusal splint
Comparison
Palatal splint
Outcome
Preference (device preferred by participants)

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Occlusal splint vs Palatal splint
Preference (device preferred by participants) · People with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnosis…
Occlusal splints for treating sleep bruxism (tooth grinding) (2007) · Cochrane All outcomes
Occlusal splint versus palatal splint, preference (Dube 2004): all participants preferred the palatal splint rather than the occlusal splint; 71% felt the occlusal splint offered greater protection for their teeth. At…1 studyGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Occlusal splints for treating sleep bruxism (tooth grinding)
2007 · Cochrane All outcomes
2007-05Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.