Question · asked by 1 review

Fluoride mouthrinse (0.05-0.32% sodium fluoride or amine fluoride) added to daily fluoride toothpaste vs Control: fluoride toothpaste alone, placebo mouthrinse + toothpaste, or non-fluoride (chlorhexidine) mouthrinse + toothpaste: Incidence of proximal (interdental) caries lesions from bitewing radiographs

Population
Orthodontic patients (any age) undergoing orthodontic treatment (mostly fixed appliances)
Intervention
Fluoride mouthrinse (0.05-0.32% sodium fluoride or amine fluoride) added to daily fluoride toothpaste
Comparison
Control: fluoride toothpaste alone, placebo mouthrinse + toothpaste, or non-fluoride (chlorhexidine) mouthrinse + toothpaste
Outcome
Incidence of proximal (interdental) caries lesions from bitewing radiographs

Only one included study assessed proximal caries incidence from bitewing radiographs; it was not included in the meta-analysis and no pooled estimate is available (ungraded).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Fluoride mouthrinse (0.05-0.32% sodium fluoride or amine fluoride) added to daily fluoride toothpaste vs Control: fluoride toothpaste alone, placebo mouthrinse + toothpaste, or non-fluoride (chlorhexidine) mouthrinse + toothpaste
Incidence of proximal (interdental) caries lesions from bitewing radiographs · Children, adolescents and adults undergoing fixed (multi-bracket) orthodontic treatment · At debonding (~23-24 months), Clinical orthodontic (fixed multi-bracket appliance) treatment
Only one included study assessed proximal caries incidence from bitewing radiographs; it was not included in the meta-analysis and no pooled estimate is available (ungraded).
Fluoride mouthrinses for prevention of initial caries in orthodontic patients - a systematic review and… (2025) All outcomes
In one study assessments of proximal caries incidence were made as well [18]. However, just the data on the incidence of white spot lesions was included in our meta-analysis as different endpoints for the assessments…1 studyGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Fluoride mouthrinses for prevention of initial caries in orthodontic patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
2025 All outcomes
September 30, 20249Low / Critically Low

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.