Provider‐ or system‐based interventions vs no intervention or another intervention: Chart review and feedback to physician plus benchmarking to vaccination rates achieved by top 10% of physicians compared to chart review and feedback
Provider‐ or system‐based interventions probably leads to higher chart review and feedback to physician plus benchmarking to… compared with no intervention or another intervention (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Provider‐ or system‐based interventions vs no intervention or another intervention Chart review and feedback to physician plus benchmarking to vaccination rates achieved by top 10% of physicians compared to chart review and feedback · people aged 60 years and older living in the community Provider‐ or system‐based interventions probably leads to higher chart review and feedback to physician plus benchmarking to… compared with no intervention or another intervention (moderate certainty). Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 3.43 [2.37, 4.97] | 1 study · 1360 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.