Question · asked by 1 review

12,500 ppm F (NaF/olaflur/dectaflur) amine fluoride gel vs Placebo gel: Adverse effects

Population
Orthodontic patients of any age with fixed braces (new DLs assessed at debond)
Intervention
12,500 ppm F (NaF/olaflur/dectaflur) amine fluoride gel
Comparison
Placebo gel
Outcome
Adverse effects

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
12,500 ppm F (NaF/olaflur/dectaflur) amine fluoride gel vs 0 ppm F placebo gel
Adverse effects · Orthodontic patients of any age with fixed braces (new DLs assessed at debond) · At debond; mean follow-up 16.6 months
Fluorides for preventing early tooth decay (demineralised lesions) during fixed brace treatment (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes
Additional SoF Table 1. Adverse effects: with placebo gel 0.60%; with fluoride gel 0.00% (0 to 0); difference 0.60% fewer (0.60 fewer to 0.60 fewer); relative effect not estimable; 312 participants (1 RCT); certainty…1 study · 312 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Fluorides for preventing early tooth decay (demineralised lesions) during fixed brace treatment
2019 · Cochrane All outcomes
1 February 2019Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.