Enhanced multidisciplinary team (EMDT) vs usual care: Time to complete healing
It is very uncertain whether enhanced multidisciplinary team (EMDT) changes time to complete healing compared with usual care (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Enhanced multidisciplinary team (EMDT) vs usual care Time to complete healing · people with pressure ulcers residing in long‐term‐care facilities It is very uncertain whether enhanced multidisciplinary team (EMDT) changes time to complete healing compared with usual care (very low certainty). Organisation of health services for preventing and treating pressure ulcers (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | HR 1.48 [0.79, 2.78] | 1 study · 161 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organisation of health services for preventing and treating pressure ulcers 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.