Question · asked by 1 review
Home (point‐of‐use) fortification of foods with multiple micronutrient powders vs iron folic acid (IFA): Preterm birth
- Population
- women during pregnancy
- Intervention
- Home (point‐of‐use) fortification of foods with multiple micronutrient powders
- Comparison
- iron folic acid (IFA)
- Outcome
- Preterm birth
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Micronutrient powders for point‐of‐use fortification of foods vs iron and folic acid supplements Preterm births (births before 37 weeks of gestation) · women during pregnancy Multiple micronutrient powders for home (point‐of‐use) fortification of foods in pregnant women (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multiple micronutrient powders for home (point‐of‐use) fortification of foods in pregnant women 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Home (point‐of‐use) fortification of foods with multiple micronutrient powders vs multiple micronutrients (MMN) · women during pregnancy · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.