Question · asked by 1 review
Any form of one-to-one oral hygiene advice (OHA) vs No OHA: Probing pocket depth
- Population
- Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
- Intervention
- Any form of one-to-one oral hygiene advice (OHA)
- Comparison
- No OHA
- Outcome
- Probing pocket depth
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Any form of one-to-one oral hygiene advice (OHA) vs No OHA Probing depth · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition) One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane All outcomes | Hetland 1982 reported pocket depths > 4 mm; measured but not synthesised or GRADE-rated (no usable pooled estimate). | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2017-11 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.