Question · asked by 1 review
HIV ADVICE vs NO HIV ADVICE: Number of participants with improved quality of life
- Population
- people with serious mental illness
- Intervention
- HIV ADVICE
- Comparison
- NO HIV ADVICE
- Outcome
- Number of participants with improved quality of life
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
HIV ADVICE vs NO HIV ADVICE Quality of life: Improved · people with serious mental illness HIV prevention advice for people with serious mental illness (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIV prevention advice for people with serious mental illness 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.