Question · asked by 1 review
Back School vs combined myofascial therapy and joint manipulation: Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale)
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Back school vs combined myofascial therapy and joint manipulation Pain (short‐term) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Scale from: 0 to 10. · participants with acute or subacute low‐back pain Back schools for acute and subacute non‐specific low‐back pain (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 62 participants | Very low |
Back school vs combined myofascial therapy and joint manipulation Pain (intermediate‐term) VAS. Scale from: 0 to 10. · participants with acute or subacute low‐back pain Back schools for acute and subacute non‐specific low‐back pain (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 63 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Back schools for acute and subacute non‐specific low‐back pain 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.