Question · asked by 1 review

Orthodontic distalising appliance (intraoral or extraoral) vs no intervention: Movement of upper incisor teeth (mm)

Population
Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or less at the start of treatment) undergoing orthodontic treatment to distalise upper first molars; patients with cleft lip and palate or other craniofacial problems excluded
Intervention
Orthodontic distalising appliance (intraoral or extraoral)
Comparison
no intervention
Outcome
Movement of upper incisor teeth (mm)

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Orthodontic distalising appliance (intraoral or extraoral) vs Untreated control (no treatment)
Movement of upper incisor teeth (mm) · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or less at the start of treatment) undergoing orthodontic treatment to…
Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents (2013) · Cochrane All outcomes
SoF table 1. Assumed risk "Not estimated"; Corresponding risk "Not estimated"; Relative effect "Meta-analysis not appropriate". Comment: "No pooled estimate due to different types of appliances (First Class and…2 studies · 74 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents
2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
2012-12Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.