Question · asked by 1 review

Powered toothbrush, rotation oscillation action vs Circular powered toothbrush: Gingivitis (level reduction)

Population
Individuals of any age with no reported disability that might affect toothbrushing (including people wearing orthodontic appliances)
Intervention
Powered toothbrush, rotation oscillation action
Comparison
Circular powered toothbrush
Outcome
Gingivitis (level reduction)

Rotation oscillation powered toothbrush led to higher gingivitis (level reduction) compared with circular powered toothbrush; GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Rotation oscillation powered toothbrush vs Circular powered toothbrush
Gingivitis (level reduction) · People of any age with no reported disability affecting their ability to practise normal self-toothbrushing;… · Short term (1-3 months)
Rotation oscillation powered toothbrush led to higher gingivitis (level reduction) compared with circular powered toothbrush; GRADE not reported.
Different powered toothbrushes for plaque control and gingival health (2010) · Cochrane All outcomes
SMD 0.87 [0.36, 1.39]1 study · 64 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Different powered toothbrushes for plaque control and gingival health
2010 · Cochrane All outcomes
2010-07Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.