Question · asked by 1 review
McKenzie therapy vs manual therapy: Adverse events
- Population
- patients with non‐specific acute and subacute low back pain
- Intervention
- McKenzie therapy
- Comparison
- manual therapy
- Outcome
- Adverse events
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
McKenzie therapy vs manual therapy Adverse events · patients with non‐specific acute and subacute low back pain The review found no eligible studies for this question. The McKenzie method for (sub)acute non‐specific low back pain (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| The McKenzie method for (sub)acute non‐specific low back pain 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- McKenzie therapy vs other interventions · patients with non‐specific acute and subacute low back pain · 1 review
- McKenzie therapy vs minimal intervention · patients with non‐specific acute and subacute low back pain · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.